Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
A processor that has impressive performance might fit well in a high-end work system, but be an unaffordable option for a home PC. A relatively low-performance chip might appear inadequate at first but be an ideal solution in a small form-factor PC where cooling and power limitations prevent power-hungrier chips from being used. Finally, I took all of the datapoints I'd gathered and compared the average scores of each processor tested for this review against its retail price, current as of this review, to measure how good of a value this processor is or isn't. As a reminder, the 3D V-Cache doesn’t accelerate all titles equally. Therefore, you should also look at the individual game benchmarks in the above album to assess the overall trend. As always, the AMD vs Intel competition can vary based on the title and the GPU you use, so it's best to make an informed decision based on the types of titles you play frequently.
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D has also been crafted for high-performance gaming and creating. Its cache capacity is 140MB, paired with twelve cores, twenty-four threads, and boost speeds up to 5.6GHz. Intel has reduced its power consumption metrics, but the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is still far more power efficient. The 7800X3D consumes much less peak power and also delivers more work per unit of power consumed. That results in a win in power consumption, efficiency, and thermal output, ultimately giving you a cooler and quieter system. The Core i9-13900K and 13700K have a more balanced profile in both single- and multi-threaded productivity applications than the 7800X3D, delivering solid performance in both disciplines. In contrast, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D suffers mightily in these workloads compared to the Intel silicon, highlighting that this is truly a highly specialized chip for gaming that won't offer as much performance in standard workloads as the regular Ryzen 7000 processors. If you're concerned about building a gaming-focused rig and everything else is a secondary concern, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is by far the superior chip over the 13900K in terms of both outright performance and value. However, the Core i9-13900K is a better option than the 7800X3D if you use productivity applications frequently, and ensuring the highest level of performance is paramount. You should also consider that AMD has both the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 97900X3D on offer, both of which offer more cores for the productivity minded while maintaining 13900K-beating levels of gaming performance. Just be prepared to pay for the privilege of faster gaming performance.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D holds its own against Intel’s best for less
The one area where the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has a hint of success is in the gaming market, but it's walking a thin line there. AMD provided us with data that clearly shows the Ryzen 7 7800X3D can perform better than the Intel Core i9-13900K or the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X when all three are paired with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. In contrast, Intel's chips consume far more power in every type of workload, resulting in higher thermal output. We have two separate battles in this contest: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i7-13700K ends in a tie, with both chips getting the nod in five categories. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i9-13900K matchup tallies up to a 5-to-3 advantage in the 7800X3D's favor. AMD's new AM5 platform generally carries a premium over the Intel motherboard ecosystem, but it does afford extended forward compatibility — AMD plans on supporting the AM5 platform until 2025+.
The rest of the test results were mixed, with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D unable to secure any more clear wins. Performance in the rest of these tests were all close together, which does show that, with a card like the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080, at least with this game subset, you won’t see much in the way of a performance benefit from the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You will likely need, as AMD advised us, a top-tier card like an RTX 4080 or RTX 4090 to see the 7800X3D pull away. But when you consider that 0.44%—that's less than half of one percent!—of PC gamers are using a GeForce RTX 4080 or 4090 per March 2023's Steam Hardware Survey these days, that's a niche within a niche's niche. Integrated Gaming Tests the chip naturally seems to run hot i would warn (no change since my old team red experience), even with a hard tubing custom loop with 2x 360mm rads I'm around 45 degree idling, under full load (gaming) this gets upto around 70 degrees gaming (75 was my peak after a few hours). Extreme loads (unrealistic loads using prime95) pushed this to 80-85 so expect to have an extra heater in your gaming room with this. I would definitely suggest a good AIO to keep it cool or high end noctua if you go fan based due to the heat. It may be by the slimmest of margins over its own sibling, but on average, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the fastest gaming chip money can buy, dethroning the 7950X3D at a much friendlier price point. It is also much faster than both of the Intel contenders. As for AMD's competition, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is up against Intel's 13th Gen Core series, specifically the Core i9-13900K and Core i7-13700K. While the Core i7-13700K is in the same price range as the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, it's worth noting that we didn't receive a sample of this particular Intel processor for testing. Instead, we reviewed the Core i9-13900K and Core i5-13600K at their launch in October of last year. For gaming-centric rigs, the Core i9-13900K doesn't offer enough gaming performance to justify its price premium over the 7800X3D, and its other deficiencies in pricing and power consumption hurt its broader overall score. However, the 13900K vs 7800X3D contest isn't as much of a blowout win as the score implies. In the end, both of these processors have their own distinct advantages and disadvantages depending on your target use case.
Log in
If you compare its power consumption with its performance, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D may well produce the best performance-per-watt ratio of any processor we’ve tested, though it would certainly be a close call with some like the Ryzen 9 7900 also performing impressively here. This is one area that AMD has a notable advantage over Intel, though energy efficiency doesn’t often drive many purchasing decisions. Our updated CPU suite for 2023 includes various benchmarks, tests, and workloads designed to show variance in performance between different processors and architectures. These include UL's latest Procyon suite with both office and photo editing workloads simulated to measure performance in these tasks, CineBench R23, Dwarf Fortress, Blender 3.3, and C-Ray 1.1. In general, as you progress from X670E to A620, expect fewer features, fewer PCIe lanes and lower prices - although no doubt we'll see cheaper X670E and premium B650 boards that will blur the lines between the four different chipsets. X670 and X670E debut in September, while B650 and B650E arrive in October. Anandtech has a great article that goes more into depth on the differences between the various chipsets. What memory is best for Ryzen 7800X3D?
Great Deal 
New Comment